Clinical Consensus Statement: Balloon Dilation of the Sinuses

Author:

Piccirillo Jay F.1,Payne Spencer C.2,Rosenfeld Richard M.3,Baroody Fuad M.4,Batra Pete S.5,DelGaudio John M.6,Edelstein David R.7,Lane Andrew P.8,Luong Amber U.9,Manes R. Peter10,McCoul Edward D.11,Platt Michael P.12,Reh Douglas D.13,Corrigan Maureen D.14

Affiliation:

1. Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri, USA

2. University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA

3. SUNY Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York, USA

4. University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA

5. Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA

6. Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA

7. New York Head and Neck Institute at the Manhattan Eye, Ear and Throat Hospital, New York, New York, USA

8. Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA

9. McGovern Medical School at the University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, Texas, USA

10. Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA

11. Ochsner Health System, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA

12. Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

13. Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA

14. American Academy of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery Founda-tion, Alexandria, Virginia, USA

Abstract

Objective To develop a clinical consensus statement on the use of sinus ostial dilation (SOD) of the paranasal sinuses. Methods An expert panel of otolaryngologists was assembled to represent general otolaryngology and relevant subspecialty societies. The target population is adults 18 years or older with chronic or recurrent rhinosinusitis (with or without nasal polyps, with or without prior sinus surgery) for whom SOD is being recommended, defined as endoscopic use of a balloon device to enlarge or open the outflow tracts of the maxillary, frontal, or sphenoid sinuses, as a standalone procedure or with endoscopic surgery. A modified Delphi method was used to distill expert opinion into clinical statements that met a standardized definition of consensus. Results After 3 iterative Delphi method surveys, 13 statements met the standardized definition of consensus while 45 statements did not. The clinical statements were grouped into 3 categories for presentation and discussion: (1) patient criteria, (2) perioperative considerations, and (3) outcomes. Strong consensus was obtained for not performing SOD in patients without sinonasal symptoms or positive findings on computed tomography (CT) in patients with symptoms only of headache or sleep apnea without criteria for sinusitis. In addition, strong consensus was met that CT scan of the sinuses was necessary before performing SOD and that surgeons need to understand and abide by regulations set forth by the US Food and Drug Administration if they choose to reuse/reprocess devices. Conclusion Expert panel consensus may provide helpful information for the otolaryngologist considering the use of SOD for the management of patients with a diagnosis of rhinosinusitis. This panel reached consensus on a number of statements that defined the use of SOD as inappropriate in the management of a variety of symptoms or diseases in the absence of underlying sinusitis. When patients meet the definition of chronic sinusitis as confirmed by CT scan, SOD of the sinuses can be indicated and/or effective in certain scenarios. Additional consensus statements regarding proper setting and safeguards for performing the procedure are described.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Otorhinolaryngology,Surgery

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3