Tonsillectomy Bleed Rates across the CHEER Practice Research Network

Author:

Lee Walter T.12,Witsell David L.1,Parham Kourosh3,Shin Jennifer J.4,Chapurin Nikita1,Pynnonen Melissa A.5,Langman Alan6,Nguyen-Huynh Anh7,Ryan Sheila E.1,Vambutas Andrea8,Roberts Rhonda S.9,Schulz Kris1

Affiliation:

1. Division of Head and Neck Surgery & Communication Sciences, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA

2. Section of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA

3. Division of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, Connecticut, USA

4. Division of Otolaryngology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

5. Department of Otolaryngology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA

6. Northwest Hearing & Balance, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA

7. Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA

8. Department of Otolaryngology, Hofstra North Shore–LIJ School of Medicine, Long Island Jewish Medical Center, New Hyde Park, New York, USA

9. Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA

Abstract

Objectives (1) Compare postoperative bleeding in the CHEER network (Creating Healthcare Excellence through Education and Research) among age groups, diagnoses, and practice types. (2) Report the incidence of bleeding by individual CHEER practice site based on practice guidelines. Study Design Retrospective data collection database review of the CHEER network based on ICD-9 and CPT codes related to tonsillectomy patients. Setting Multisite practice–based network. Subjects and Methods A total of 8347 subjects underwent tonsillectomy as determined by procedure code within the retrospective data collection database, and 107 had postoperative hemorrhage. These subjects had demographic information and related diagnoses based on the CPT and ICD-9 codes collected. Postoperative ICD-9 and CPT codes were used to identify patients who also had postoperative bleed. Variables included age (<12 vs ≥12 years), diagnoses (infectious vs noninfectious), and practice type (community vs academic). Statistical analysis included multivariate logistic regression variables predictive of postoperative bleeding, with P < .05 considered significant. Results Thirteen sites contributed data to the study (7 academic, 6 community). There was postoperative bleeding for an overall bleed rate of 1.3%. Patients ≥12 years old had a significantly increased bleed rate when compared with the younger group (odds ratio, 5.98; 95% confidence interval: 3.79-9.44; P < .0001). There was no significant difference in bleed rates when practices or diagnoses were compared. Conclusion A site descriptor database built to expedite clinical research can be used for practice assessment and quality improvement. These data were also useful to identify patient risk factors for posttonsillectomy bleed.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Otorhinolaryngology,Surgery

Cited by 19 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3