Affiliation:
1. North Carolina State University,
2. PreVisor
Abstract
The most commonly used and accepted model of assessing bias in a selection context is that proposed by Cleary in which predictor-criterion regression lines are tested for both slope and intercept equality. With this approach, any difference in intercepts or slopes is considered an indication of bias. We argue that differing regression lines intercepts is indicative of differential prediction but not test bias. We describe several fundamentally different potential causes of differences in groups’ regression line intercepts, many of which are unrelated to test properties. We argue that differential prediction because of such sources should not preclude the use of the test in selection contexts. We propose a new procedure to potentially identify the source of regression line differences and illustrate this framework using a job incumbent sample.
Subject
Management of Technology and Innovation,Strategy and Management,General Decision Sciences
Reference69 articles.
1. UNDERSTANDING THE IMPACT OF TEST VALIDITY AND BIAS ON SELECTION ERRORS AND ADVERSE IMPACT IN HUMAN RESOURCE SELECTION
2. Austin, J.T. & Crespin, T.R. ( 2006). Problems of criteria in industrial and organizational psychology: progress, pitfalls, and prospects. In W. J. Bennett, C. E. Lance, & D. J. Woehr (Eds.). Performance measurement: Current perspectives and future challenges (pp. 9-48). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
3. TESTING FOR FAIRNESS WITH A MODERATED MULTIPLE REGRESSION STRATEGY: AN ALTERNATIVE TO DIFFERENTIAL ANALYSIS
Cited by
35 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献