Flow diversion for posterior circulation aneurysms: a multicenter retrospective study

Author:

Qi Peng1,Tong Xin2ORCID,Liang Xin3,Xue Xiaopeng2,Wu Zhongxue4,Feng Xin5,Zhang Meng6,Jiang Zhiqun7,Wang Daming8,Liu Aihua9ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China

2. Beijing Neurosurgical Institute, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China

3. Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China

4. Neurointerventional Center, Beijing Neurosurgical Institute and Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China

5. Neurosurgery Center, Department of Cerebrovascular Surgery, Engineering Technology Research Center of the Education Ministry of China on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Cerebrovascular Disease, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China

6. Department of Neurosurgery, Shenzhen Second People’s Hospital, Shenzhen, China

7. Department of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China

8. Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, No. 1, Dongdan Dahua Road, Dongcheng District, Beijing 100005, China

9. Neurointerventional Center, Department of Neurointervention, Beijing Neurosurgical Institute and Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, 119 Fanyang Road, Fengtai District, Beijing 100070, China

Abstract

Background: The prevalence of intracranial aneurysms is approximately 3% worldwide. Posterior circulation (PC) aneurysms have a higher risk of treatment complications than anterior circulation aneurysms. Improving the survival rate and quality of life of patients with PC aneurysms remains one of the most important issues in the field. Objectives: Flow diverter (FD) treatment of PC aneurysms remains controversial. We aimed to investigate the effects of FD treatment and analyze differences among different application methods or aneurysm types in PC aneurysms. Design: This is a multicenter retrospective study. Methods: Patients with PC aneurysms treated with the pipeline embolization device (PED) or Tubridge embolization device (TED) between 2015 and 2020 in five neurovascular centers were retrospectively enrolled. The primary outcomes were major perioperative complication, clinical outcome, and aneurysm occlusion rates. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to determine the risk factors of each outcome. Results: In total, 252 aneurysms were included. Major perioperative complication, favorable clinical outcome, and complete occlusion rates were 7.5%, 91.0%, and 79.1%, respectively. Compared with other types of aneurysms, dissecting aneurysms had the best clinical outcome and highest occlusion rate. Both clinical and angiographic outcomes were independently associated with the aneurysm location at the basilar artery. Aneurysm size was not associated with any outcome. TED had similar clinical and angiographic outcomes compared with PED but more perioperative major complications. Tandem treatment and coiling assistance may have poorer clinical outcomes but similar occlusion rates. Single- and multiple-stent treatments had similar outcomes. Conclusion: FD treatment of PC aneurysms achieved favorable clinical outcomes and long-term aneurysm occlusion rates with acceptable perioperative complication rates, especially in dissecting and non-basilar artery aneurysms. There was no additional improvement in outcomes with coiling assistance, multi-stent application, or tandem treatment. Therefore, the use of PC aneurysms should be carefully considered.

Funder

Natural Science Foundation of China

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Neurology (clinical),Neurology,Pharmacology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3