Affiliation:
1. University of California, Los Angeles
Abstract
This article presents an overview of what we know about two perspectives, coined instructionist and constructionist, to games for learning. The instructionists, accustomed to thinking in terms of making instructional educational materials, turn naturally to the concept of designing instructional games. Far fewer people have sought to turn the tables: by making games for learning instead of playing games for learning. Rather than embedding “lessons” directly in games, constructionists have focused their efforts on providing students with greater opportunities to construct their own games—and to construct new relationships with knowledge in the process. Research has only begun to build a body of experience that willmake us believe in the value of playing and making games for learning.
Subject
Human-Computer Interaction,Applied Psychology,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Anthropology,Communication,Cultural Studies
Cited by
300 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Promising practices for online professional learning;Computers and Education Open;2024-12
2. Scaffolding Creative Programming Projects;Proceedings of the 19th WiPSCE Conference on Primary and Secondary Computing Education Research;2024-09-16
3. Leveraging Minecraft for Enhanced Spatial Perception and Academic Achievement;Advances in Educational Technologies and Instructional Design;2024-06-28
4. Deepening children’s STEM learning through making and creative writing;International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction;2024-06
5. Teaching Robotics Concepts with Besiege: A Game- Based Approach for Developing Design and Problem-Solving Skills;2024 47th MIPRO ICT and Electronics Convention (MIPRO);2024-05-20