Patient-reported outcomes at hospital discharge among patients with arrhythmia: Results from the national DenHeart survey

Author:

Thrysoee Lars12,Thorup Charlotte Brun3,Rasmussen Trine Bernholdt4,Borregaard Britt25,Christensen Anne Vinggaard6,Juel Knud7,Ekholm Ola7,Vamosi Marianne8,Banke Ann12,Berg Selina Kikkenborg67

Affiliation:

1. Department of Cardiology, Odense University Hospital, Denmark

2. Department of Health Sciences, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark

3. Department of Cardiology and Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery and Clinical Nursing Research Unit, Aalborg University Hospital, Denmark

4. Department of Cardiology, Herlev and Gentofte University Hospital, Denmark

5. Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Odense University Hospital, Denmark

6. The Heart Centre, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark

7. National Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark

8. Section for Nursing Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark

Abstract

Background: Patient-reported outcomes are important predictors of mortality, cardiovascular events and hospitalisation in patients with cardiac diseases, but differences in patient-reported outcomes between groups of patients with arrhythmia have not yet been investigated. Aims: To describe and compare patient-reported outcomes at discharge among patients with different types of cardiac arrhythmia and to examine the associations between demographic characteristics, inhospital factors and patient-reported outcomes. Methods: Data were derived from the national DenHeart study including patient-reported outcomes from the following questionnaires: the hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS), HeartQoL, short form 12 (SF-12), current health status (EQ-5D), brief illness perception questionnaire (B-IPQ) and the Edmonton symptom assessment scale (ESAS). Clinical and demographic data were obtained from national registers. Multiple linear and logistic regression models were used to investigate the associations between the potential risk factors and the patient-reported outcomes. Results: A total of 4251 patients diagnosed with arrhythmia completed the questionnaire. Across the arrhythmia subgroups, some differences were observed. In general, patient-reported outcome scores were worst among patients with ‘ventricular arrhythmia’ (e.g. highest depression scores and highest prevalence of feeling unsafe at discharge). Regression analysis revealed that longer hospital stay, female gender, being unmarried and having a short education were significantly associated with poor health for almost all arrhythmia subgroups. Conclusion: Differences exist in self-reported health, quality of life and symptom burden across arrhythmia groups with patients with ventricular arrhythmia reporting poorer patient-reported outcomes. Longer hospital stay, female gender, being unmarried and having a low level of education were significantly associated with worse outcomes among the total population.

Funder

novo nordisk fonden

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Advanced and Specialised Nursing,Medical–Surgical,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3