Barriers to ESC guideline implementation: results of a survey from the European Council on Cardiovascular Nursing and Allied Professions (CCNAP)

Author:

McKee Gabrielle12,Kerins Mary13,Hamilton Glenys145,Hansen Tina16,Hendriks Jeroen178,Kletsiou Eleni19,Lambrinou Ekaterini110,Jennings Catriona111,Fitzsimons Donna112

Affiliation:

1. Council on Cardiovascular Nursing and Allied Health Professionals (CCNAP), European Society of Cardiology, Sophia Antipolis, France

2. School of Nursing & Midwifery, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland

3. Cardiac Rehabilitation, St James Hospital, Dublin, Ireland

4. Consultant in Nursing Education and Cardiovascular Research, Lancaster, MA, USA

5. Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA

6. Department of Cardiology, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark

7. Centre for Heart Rhythm Disorders, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, Australia

8. Department of Health and Medical Sciences, Linköping University, Sweden

9. University General Hospital “ATTIKON”, Chaidari, Athens, Greece

10. Department of Nursing, Cyprus University of Technology, Limassol, Cyprus

11. Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, National Heart and Lung Institute, London, UK

12. School of Nursing, Queens University, Belfast, UK

Abstract

Background: The European Society of Cardiology (ESC) has a comprehensive clinical guideline development programme, relevant for all clinicians. However, implementation of guidelines is not always optimal. Aim: The aim of this study was to determine nurses’ and allied professionals’ awareness and barriers regarding clinical guideline implementation. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was administrated online and in print at EuroHeartCare 2015. A questionnaire was developed which examined awareness and barriers to implementation of ESC guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice (2012) and ESC guidelines in general. Results: Of the 298 respondents, 12% reported that the prevention guidelines were used in their practice area. Respondents identified, in order of magnitude, that lack of leadership, workload, time, resources and a perception that they were unable to influence current practice were barriers to the use of the prevention guidelines. When asked to rank barriers to use of any ESC guidelines, time (22%) and leadership (23%) were ranked highest. Conclusions: Implementation of ESC guidelines by nurses, the majority responders in this survey, is a serious problem, requiring urgent improvement to ensure patients receive optimal evidence based care. Issues of leadership, workload, time and resources are significant barriers to guideline implementation. It is of concern that these professionals perceive both that they have little influence on implementation decisions and lack of leadership regarding guideline implementation. Educational and organisational strategies to improve leadership skills are imperative. These will build self-efficacy and empower nurses and allied professionals to advocate for evidence-based care in the clinical environment.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Advanced and Specialised Nursing,Medical–Surgical,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3