Affiliation:
1. Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel; UNISA-University of South Africa, South Africa
Abstract
The sociological literature on femicide, compared to intimate partner and other forms of gender violence, is scarce. While feminist sociology has addressed the inaudibility of women, femicide remains invisible. Femicide rates are social facts worthy of sociological attention. Like suicide, femicide has to be defined and analysed according to type. The article postulates possible reasons for the invisibility of the phenomenon, such as the unpleasantness of the subject, scope, its conception as a radical feminist idea, fuzziness, its identification with other concepts like genocide, and methodological difficulties in researching it because of the impossibility of researching dead women first-hand, missing data and the difficulties in comparing data cross-nationally. None of the seven posited hypotheses could account for the dearth of sociological literature on the subject. Suggestions for enhancing the visibility of femicide are made, with a call to unearth the phenomenon and remove its invisibility in sociology.
Subject
Sociology and Political Science
Cited by
48 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Femicide in the United States: a call for legal codification and national surveillance;Frontiers in Public Health;2024-02-28
2. A conceptual framework of gender-based violence and femicide drivers in South Africa;International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147- 4478);2023-07-28
3. Intimate Femicide/Intimate Partner Femicide;The Routledge International Handbook of Femicide and Feminicide;2023-04-20
4. Femicide in Australia;The Routledge International Handbook of Femicide and Feminicide;2023-04-20
5. Violence against Women—The Case of Divorced Palestinian-Arab women in Israel;Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society;2023-03-20