Affiliation:
1. Department of Philosophy, University of Miami, USA
Abstract
Michael Hand’s pithy and challenging essay (Hand, 2003) offers a neat, clear and powerful argument against ‘faith schools’. I am in considerable sympathy with Hand’s position. However, I think his argument can be strengthened, and weaknesses in it remedied or avoided. In this brief note, I offer some modest suggestions, which are intended as ‘friendly amendments’ to Hand’s argument.
Cited by
13 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Noncognitive religious influence and initiation in Tillson’s Children, Religion and the Ethics of Influence;Journal of Philosophy of Education;2024-01-24
2. Varieties of (Extended) Thought Manipulation;The Law and Ethics of Freedom of Thought, Volume 1;2021
3. Introduction;Special Religious Education in Australia and its Value to Contemporary Society;2021
4. Some Controversial Aspects Regarding Indoctrination;International conference KNOWLEDGE-BASED ORGANIZATION;2020-06-01
5. The Political Morality of School Composition: The Case of Religious Selection;British Journal of Political Science;2019-06-26