Delineating Quality Indicators of Inpatient Psychiatric Hospitalization

Author:

Delaney Kathleen R.1ORCID,Loucks Jeannine2,Ray Richard3,Blair Ellen4,Nadler-Moodie Marlene5,Batscha Catherine6,Sharp David7,Milliken Dani8

Affiliation:

1. Kathleen R. Delaney, PhD, PMH-NP, FAAN, Rush College of Nursing, Chicago, IL, USA

2. Jeannine Loucks, MSN, RN-BC, PMH, Villa Park, CA, USA

3. Richard Ray, MS, RN, PMH-BC, Northwestern Memorial Hospital Stone Institute of Psychiatry, Chicago, IL, USA

4. Ellen Blair, DNP, APRN, PMHCNS-BC, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT, USA

5. Marlene Nadler-Moodie, MSN, APRN, PMHCNS-BC, Scripps Mercy Hospital San Diego, CA, USA

6. Catherine Batscha, DNP, RN, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA

7. David Sharp, PhD, RN, Mississippi College, Clinton, MS, USA

8. Dani Milliken, DHA, MS, BSN, RN, Children’s Hospital of Orange County, Orange, CA, USA

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Assuring quality care is critical to the well-being and recovery of individuals receiving inpatient psychiatric treatment, yet a comprehensive map of quality inpatient care does not exist. AIMS: To isolate and describe quality elements of inpatient psychiatric treatment. METHOD: A survey queried psychiatric inpatient nursing leaders on what they considered to be critical elements of quality. The survey was emailed to 40 American Psychiatric Nurses Association members, and 39 individuals responded. In the survey, participants were asked to comment on the importance of six dimensions of quality as well as quality indicators used on their units. RESULTS: Data from this survey indicate how thought leaders conceptualized quality of inpatient care. A unifying philosophy of care was endorsed as a quality element as was structure that affords staff available time on the unit—engaging with patients. While staffing levels were viewed as important, the respondents commented on the nuances between staffing and quality. Participants endorsed the importance of involving individuals in their treatment planning as well as tapping into patients’ perspectives on the treatment experience. CONCLUSION: The participants’ responses compliment the quality literature and reinforce the need to develop a comprehensive map of quality elements. These elements interact in complex way, for instance, staffing, engagement, and teamwork is tied to the organizational structure and philosophy of care, which in turn facilitates consumer involvement in care. Thus, gauging the impact of quality on outcomes will demand consideration of the interaction of factors not just the linear relationship of one element to an outcome.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Phychiatric Mental Health

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3