Alcohol Withdrawal Assessment Tool (AWAT) Reliability and Validity: Implications for Nurses Caring for Inpatients With Mental Health Disorders

Author:

Davis Carmen R.1ORCID,Keen Alyson2ORCID,Compton Lauren3,Rader Tiffany4,Harbison Rachel5,Twibell Renee6

Affiliation:

1. Carmen R. Davis, MSN, RN, CNS-BC, Indiana University Health University Hospital, Indianapolis, IN, USA

2. Alyson Keen, PhD, RN, ACNS-BC, Indiana University Health Adult Academic Health Center, Indianapolis, IN, USA

3. Lauren Compton, MSN, RN, AGCNS-BC, Indiana University Health Methodist Hospital, Indianapolis, IN, USA

4. Tiffany Rader, MSN, RN, AGCNS-BC, Indiana University Health Methodist Hospital, Indianapolis, IN, USA

5. Rachel Harbison, BSN, RN, PCCN-K, Indiana University Health Ball Memorial Hospital, Muncie, IN, USA

6. Renee Twibell, PhD, RN, CNE, Indiana University Health, Muncie, IN, USA; Ball State University, Muncie, IN, USA

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Alcohol use affects 14.5 million Americans and high prevalence of use and potential for withdrawal among hospitalized patients presents a challenge for health care professionals to anticipate and manage effectively. Due to the acuity and fast-paced nature of the hospital environment, nurses need assessment tools that can be readily completed and drive efficient protocol-based treatment. The purpose of this study was to examine psychometric properties of the alcohol withdrawal assessment tool (AWAT). AIMS: The aims were to examine AWAT (1) reliability, (2) validity, and (3) usability. METHODS: Patients ( n = 55) and nurses ( n = 47) were recruited from six hospitals within one health care system in the Midwest. Psychometric testing included inter-rater reliability and criterion-related validity testing, using the Clinical Institute Withdrawal Assessment of Alcohol Scale-Revised (CIWA-Ar) as a comparison. Usability was assessed with a 5-item Likert-type scale. RESULTS: Findings supported strong agreement (ICC: .931) between raters on the AWAT and a moderate correlation (Pearson r: .548) between scores on the AWAT and CIWA-Ar. Nurses agreed/strongly agreed that the AWAT took 2 min or less to complete ( n = 42; 89%), was easy to use for assessment ( n = 42; 89%) was easy to learn ( n = 40; 85%), and they were confident using the AWAT ( n = 39; 83%). CONCLUSIONS: Study findings provide evidence of reliability, validity, and usability of the AWAT in the hospital setting. The AWAT has potential to improve assessment efficiency and nurses caring for inpatients with mental health disorders should consider implementing the tool into practice.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Pshychiatric Mental Health

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3