Innovative solutions for an age-old issue: How transparency and data analytic tools can improve diversity in international arbitration

Author:

Brodlija Fahira1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. International University of Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina

Abstract

International arbitration is an inherently diverse field. The disputing parties and their counsel come from all over the world, but the arbitrators selected by these same parties and their counsel rarely reflect their diverse backgrounds. Although the arbitration community largely supports diversity initiatives and the goal of making arbitral tribunals more reflective of the parties and the global community, the available studies that parties and their counsel continue to appoint a small number of repeat players to the tribunals. This paper traces the diversity deficiency to its roots in the lack of available information about diverse arbitrators and the cognitive biases that perpetuate the vicious cycle of repeat appointments. The paper then turns to potential solutions in the form of data analytic tools, that would collect, analyze and provide information on the case management and decision making of arbitrators.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Reference54 articles.

1. https://static1.squarespace.com/static/57fe4d37c534a5c932910b78/t/586fd77886e6c0cb06cbee9a/1483724664802/Balance2.pdf. (accessed 29 July 2020).

2. African Arbitration Association (2021) The African Arbitration Association publishes The African Arbitration Atlas. Available at: https://afaa.ngo/page-18351 (accessed 19 February 2021).

3. Anderson G, Jerman G, Tarrant S (2020) Diversity in international arbitration. In: Thompson Reuters Practical Law. Available at: https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/w0195028?transitionType=Default&contextData=(sc.Default)&firstPage=true&bhcp=1; https://iccwbo.org/publication/icc-dispute-resolution-statistics/ (accessed 30 September 2020).

4. Arbitrator Intelligence (2021) Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs). Available at: https://arbitratorintelligence.com/faqs/ (accessed 27 August 2020).

5. Empirical Perspectives on Investment Arbitration: What Do We Know? Does It Matter?

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3