High Deductible Health Plans and Use of Free Preventive Services Under the Affordable Care Act

Author:

Shafer Paul R.1ORCID,Dusetzina Stacie B.2,Sabik Lindsay M.3,Platts-Mills Timothy F.4,Stearns Sally C.5,Trogdon Justin G.5

Affiliation:

1. Department of Health Law, Policy, and Management, School of Public Health, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA

2. Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA

3. School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA

4. School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA

5. Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA

Abstract

The Affordable Care Act aimed to increase use of preventive services by eliminating cost-sharing to consumers. However, patients may be unaware of this benefit or they may not seek preventive services if they anticipate that the cost of potential diagnostic or treatment services will be too high, both more likely among those in high deductible health plans. We used nationally representative private health insurance claims (100% sample of IBM® MarketScan®) for the United States from 2006 to 2018, restricting the data to enrollment and claims for non-elderly adults who were enrolled for the full plan year. The cross-sectional sample (185 million person-years) is used to describe trends in preventive service use and costs from 2008 through 2016. The cohort sample (9 million people) focuses on the elimination of cost-sharing for certain high-value preventive services in late 2010, requiring continuous enrollment across 2010 and 2011. We examine whether HDHP enrollment is associated with use of eligible preventive services using semi-parametric difference-in-differences to account for endogenous plan selection. Our preferred model implies that HDHP enrollment was associated with a reduction of the post-ACA change in any use of eligible preventive services by 0.2 percentage points or 12.5%. Cancer screenings were unaffected but HDHP enrollment was associated with smaller increases in wellness visits, immunizations, and screening for chronic conditions and sexually transmitted infections. We also find that the policy was ineffective at reducing out-of-pocket costs for the eligible preventive services, likely due to implementation issues.

Funder

Robert Wood Johnson Foundation

Horowitz Foundation for Social Policy

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Health Policy

Reference87 articles.

1. Few Americans Receive All High-Priority, Appropriate Clinical Preventive Services

2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Healthy People – Healthy People 2020. Published November 6, 2015. Accessed May 9, 2018. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/healthy_people/hp2020.htm

3. Healthy People 2020. Midcourse review: LHIs. n.d. Accessed October 17, 2018. https://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/data-search/midcourse-review/lhi

4. How and why researchers use the number needed to vaccinate to inform decision making—A systematic review

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3