Intensive Care Units Healthcare Professionals’ Experiences and Negotiations at the Beginning of the COVID-19 Pandemic in Germany: A Grounded Theory Study

Author:

Hörold Madlen1ORCID,Drewitz Karl Philipp1ORCID,Piel Julia1ORCID,Hrudey Ilona1ORCID,Rohr Magdalena23,Brunnthaler Vreni2,Hasenpusch Claudia1,Ulrich Angela1,Otto Niklas14,Brandstetter Susanne3,Apfelbacher Christian1

Affiliation:

1. Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg, Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Social Medicine and Health Systems Research, Magdeburg, Saxony-Anhalt, Germany

2. University of Regensburg, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Sociology, Regensburg, Bavaria, Germany

3. University of Regensburg, University Children’s Hospital Regensburg (KUNO-Clinics), Regensburg, Bavaria, Germany

4. University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Saxony-Anhalt, Germany

Abstract

Faced with the pandemic of the novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2), healthcare professionals (HCPs) in intensive care units (ICU) adjusted their organizational, operational, and personal procedures to ensure care for COVID-19 patients. We used grounded theory approach to explore ICU HCPs' perspectives on professional action at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany from March to July 2020. The study aimed to examine implicit principles on negotiating social practice and interaction of ICU HCPs in an exceptional situation, which was characterized by a high level of changes. We conducted theme-guided qualitative telephone/virtual interviews with 39 ICU HCPs from ten German federal states. The data collection followed the principles of theoretical sampling. We adpoted grounded theory approach proposed by Charmaz and discussed using Lüscher’s theoretical concept of ambivalence. The analysis revealed five interconnected categories about the ICU HCPs’ negotiation of social practice and interaction at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany. In this context, a complex field of ambivalence (key category) emerged between habits and routines of a pre-pandemic normality. Pragmatic restructuring processes were initiated, which quickly resulted in a new normality of a “daily routine of preparation”. Dealing with ambivalence offers the potential for change.

Funder

Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Health Policy

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3