Regulating in the public interest: Lessons learned during the COVID-19 pandemic

Author:

Myles Sophia12,Leslie Kathleen2ORCID,Adams Tracey L.3,Nelson Sioban1

Affiliation:

1. University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

2. Athabasca University, Athabasca, Alberta, Canada.

3. Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.

Abstract

This article has three aims. First, to reflect on how conceptualizations of the public interest may have shifted due to COVID-19. Second, to focus on the implications of regulatory responses for the health workforce and corresponding lessons as health leaders and systems transition from pandemic response to pandemic recovery. Third, to identify how these lessons lead to potential directions for future research, connecting regulation in a whole-of-systems approach to health system safety and health workforce capacity and sustainability. Pandemic regulatory responses highlighted both strengths and limitations of regulatory structures and frameworks. The COVID-19 pandemic may have introduced new considerations around regulating in the public interest, particularly as the impact of regulatory responses on the health workforce continues to be examined. Clearly articulating practitioner practice parameters, reducing barriers to practice, and working collaboratively with stakeholders were primary aspects of regulators' pandemic responses that impacted the health workforce.

Funder

National Council of State Boards of Nursing

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Health Policy

Reference52 articles.

1. Defining Health Profession Regulators’ Roles in the Canadian Healthcare System

2. Acting in the Public Interest: Learnings and Commentary on the Occupational Licensure Literature

3. Casey JT. Canada: Professional regulation: The political winds are blowing. 2019. Available at: https://www.mondaq.com/canada/constitutional-administrative-law/809550/professionalregulation-the-political-winds-are-blowing Accessed March 29, 2022.

4. Health professional regulation in historical context: Canada, the USA and the UK (19th century to present)

5. Leslie K, Myles S, Adams TL, et al. Regulating Professionals in Virtual Practice: Protecting the Public Interest in Rapidly Changing Digital Workplaces. SSHRC Knowledge Synthesis Grant Final Report. Athabasca, Canada: Athabasca University; 2021:41. Available at: https://auspace.athabascau.ca/handle/2149/3657 Accessed March 30, 2022.

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3