Prescription strategy of antimalarials in cutaneous and systemic lupus erythematosus: an international survey

Author:

Petitdemange Arthur1ORCID,Felten Renaud1ORCID,Sibilia Jean1,Martin Thierry2,Arnaud Laurent3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Service de Rhumatologie, Centre National de Référence des Maladies Autoimmunes Systémiques Rares Est Sud-Ouest (RESO), Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France

2. Service d’Immunologie Clinique et de Médecine Interne, Centre National de Référence des Maladies Autoimmunes Systémiques Rares Est Sud-Ouest (RESO), Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France

3. Service de Rhumatologie, Centre National de Référence des Maladies Autoimmunes et Systémiques Rares (RESO), Hôpital de Hautepierre, 1 Avenue Molière BP 83049, Strasbourg Cedex, 67098, France

Abstract

Background: Antimalarial agents (AMs), mainly hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and chloroquine, are the cornerstone of treatment of cutaneous and systemic lupus erythematosus. However, many aspects of AM prescription remain empirical. The aim of this study was to assess the modalities of AM prescription among physicians treating patients with lupus and to verify the assumption that AM use is heterogeneous and frequently at variance with international guidelines. Methods: We performed an international cross-sectional study among physicians involved in lupus care, using a web-based survey (from September 2019 to July 2020) addressing the main controversial aspects of AM prescription. Results: A total of 298 physicians [median age: 42 (interquartile range: 17) years, mainly internists and rheumatologists] from 35 countries participated to the study. A total of 93% used HCQ as the first-line AM, 69.5% used fixed doses of AMs (mainly 400 mg/day for HCQ) and only 37.9% adjusted the dose in case of renal failure. The main reasons for measuring HCQ blood levels were suspected non-adherence (55.7%) and failure of AM treatment (34.1%). In case of AM failure, 58.0% added an immunosuppressive agent. In case of remission, 49.7% maintained the same dose of AM, whereas 48.3% reduced the dose. One-third of respondents reported not following the American screening guidelines on AM retinal toxicity and 40.9% started retinal screening from the first year of treatment. Conclusion: This study highlights the strong heterogeneity of AM prescription in lupus, as well as several key unmet needs regarding AMs. This may be improved by developing more comprehensive recommendations and favoring dissemination among physicians.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Orthopedics and Sports Medicine,Rheumatology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3