The 2023 US 50-State National Seismic Hazard Model: Overview and implications

Author:

Petersen Mark D12ORCID,Shumway Allison M1ORCID,Powers Peter M1ORCID,Field Edward H1,Moschetti Morgan P1ORCID,Jaiswal Kishor S1ORCID,Milner Kevin R3,Rezaeian Sanaz1ORCID,Frankel Arthur D4,Llenos Andrea L1ORCID,Michael Andrew J5ORCID,Altekruse Jason M1ORCID,Ahdi Sean K16ORCID,Withers Kyle B1ORCID,Mueller Charles S1,Zeng Yuehua1,Chase Robert E17ORCID,Salditch Leah M18,Luco Nicolas1ORCID,Rukstales Kenneth S1,Herrick Julie A1ORCID,Girot Demi L1,Aagaard Brad T1,Bender Adrian M9,Blanpied Michael L10,Briggs Richard W1,Boyd Oliver S1ORCID,Clayton Brandon S1,DuRoss Christopher B1,Evans Eileen L11ORCID,Haeussler Peter J9,Hatem Alexandra E1,Haynie Kirstie L1,Hearn Elizabeth H12,Johnson Kaj M13,Kortum Zachary A1,Kwong N Simon1,Makdisi Andrew J1ORCID,Mason H Benjamin114,McNamara Daniel E15,McPhillips Devin F16,Okubo Paul G17,Page Morgan T16,Pollitz Fred F5,Rubinstein Justin L5,Shaw Bruce E18,Shen Zheng-Kang19,Shiro Brian R1ORCID,Smith James A1ORCID,Stephenson William J1,Thompson Eric M1ORCID,Thompson Jobe Jessica A1,Wirth Erin A4,Witter Robert C9

Affiliation:

1. Geologic Hazards Science Center, US Geological Survey, Golden, CO, USA

2. Denver Federal Center, Denver, CO, USA

3. University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA

4. Earthquake Science Center, US Geological Survey, Seattle, WA, USA

5. Earthquake Science Center, US Geological Survey, Moffett Field, CA, USA

6. AECOM, Los Angeles, CA, USA

7. Lettis Consultants International, Boulder, CO, USA

8. Guy Carpenter, Chicago, IL, USA

9. US Geological Survey, Anchorage, AK, USA

10. US Geological Survey, Reston, VA, USA

11. California State University, Northridge, Northridge, CA, USA

12. Capstone Geophysics, Portola Valley, CA, USA

13. Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA

14. College of Engineering, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA

15. EarthScope Consortium, Washington, DC, USA

16. Earthquake Science Center, US Geological Survey, Pasadena, CA, USA

17. Hawaiian Volcano Observatory, US Geological Survey, Hilo, HI, USA

18. Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Palisades, NY, USA

19. University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA

Abstract

The US National Seismic Hazard Model (NSHM) was updated in 2023 for all 50 states using new science on seismicity, fault ruptures, ground motions, and probabilistic techniques to produce a standard of practice for public policy and other engineering applications (defined for return periods greater than ∼475 or less than ∼10,000 years). Changes in 2023 time-independent seismic hazard (both increases and decreases compared to previous NSHMs) are substantial because the new model considers more data and updated earthquake rupture forecasts and ground-motion components. In developing the 2023 model, we tried to apply best available or applicable science based on advice of co-authors, more than 50 reviewers, and hundreds of hazard scientists and end-users, who attended public workshops and provided technical inputs. The hazard assessment incorporates new catalogs, declustering algorithms, gridded seismicity models, magnitude-scaling equations, fault-based structural and deformation models, multi-fault earthquake rupture forecast models, semi-empirical and simulation-based ground-motion models, and site amplification models conditioned on shear-wave velocities of the upper 30 m of soil and deeper sedimentary basin structures. Seismic hazard calculations yield hazard curves at hundreds of thousands of sites, ground-motion maps, uniform-hazard response spectra, and disaggregations developed for pseudo-spectral accelerations at 21 oscillator periods and two peak parameters, Modified Mercalli Intensity, and 8 site classes required by building codes and other public policy applications. Tests show the new model is consistent with past ShakeMap intensity observations. Sensitivity and uncertainty assessments ensure resulting ground motions are compatible with known hazard information and highlight the range and causes of variability in ground motions. We produce several impact products including building seismic design criteria, intensity maps, planning scenarios, and engineering risk assessments showing the potential physical and social impacts. These applications provide a basis for assessing, planning, and mitigating the effects of future earthquakes.

Funder

U.S. Geological Survey - Earthquake Hazards Program

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Geophysics,Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology

Cited by 18 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3