Qualitative analysis at the interface of Indigenous and Western knowledge systems: the Herringbone stitch model

Author:

Andrews Shawana1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. The University of Melbourne, Australia

Abstract

This article describes the methodological challenges and opportunities of qualitative analysis from a position of critical Indigenous inquiry. It does not present findings but rather demonstrates a process of critical engagement with different methodologies to realize the most appropriate way to analyze data generated by Indigenous research. The article explores ‘interface research’, drawing upon multiple knowledge systems for data analysis as a means of producing new knowledge beneficial to Indigenous communities. Linking Western and Indigenous systems of knowledge, the contradictions and congruences of a hermeneutic study are explored as they pertain to the analysis of 15 Indigenous women’s lived experience of family violence. Indigenous methodology, in combination with hermeneutic principles, defined the process of analysis at the interface. As a result, a qualitative analytic model was developed and is offered as an innovative example of Indigenous data analysis that maintains Indigenous integrity and sovereignty and facilitates benefit to Indigenous women.

Funder

Indigenous Research Initiative, Melbourne Hallmark Research Initiatives Program, the University of Melbourne, Australia

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

History and Philosophy of Science,Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

Reference54 articles.

1. Collective Memory and Cultural Identity

2. Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies (2017) A possum skin cloak. Available at: https://aiatsis.gov.au/exhibitions/possum-skin-cloak (accessed 25 February 2019).

3. Being, Knowing, and Doing

4. Two-Eyed Seeing and other lessons learned within a co-learning journey of bringing together indigenous and mainstream knowledges and ways of knowing

5. Now I see it, now I don’t: researcher’s position and reflexivity in qualitative research

Cited by 11 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3