Affiliation:
1. Open University Business School, UK
2. Oxford Brookes University Business School, UK
Abstract
Many funding bodies emphasize the advantages of using multi-disciplinary approaches; in response, in this article we consider our reflections on doing such a project. We contribute to the multi-disciplinary literature by considering the standardizing effect of collaboration on multifarious research approaches. We argue that greater attention should be paid to ‘doing’ qualitative multi-disciplinary research. We find that elements of ‘letting go’ and ‘coming together’ are important when new perspectives and knowledge are engaged. Therefore, we call for clarity on the multi-disciplinary approaches and discuss how we came to understand the collaborative processes of researching, thinking, and writing. The paper begins with vignettes about our ontological journeys during the research project. In developing our argument, we consider the retrospective and reflexive qualities expressed in our vignettes and examine how our collaborative theorizing shaped the research project.
Subject
History and Philosophy of Science,Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
Reference66 articles.
1. Telling Stories: Reflexivity, Queer Theory, and Autoethnography
2. Backhouse J, Demetis D, Dye R, Canhoto A, Nardo M (2005) Spotlight: New Approaches to Fighting Money-Laundering. London: London School of Economics, 134.
3. Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter
Cited by
25 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献