Affiliation:
1. Vanderbilt University
2. University of Pittsburgh
3. Tennessee School for the Blind
Abstract
The prevalence of students with visual impairments varies across the United States, yet limited analysis exists on how many students receive special education services. The following study collected population data on students with visual impairments for the 2017–2018 school year and ran focus groups with state-level administrators to understand current and future options to collect population data. Twenty-three of 50 states responding to the survey reported total population data. On average, states supported 3.6 times the number of students with visual impairments reported in their federal Child Count data reports. State administrators agreed a federal mandate requiring states to collect total population data on students with visual impairments is needed. The ramifications of preparing for and supporting an unknown population of students with disabilities was discussed. A federal mandate for total population data collection is unlikely in the near future. Therefore, practical implications, including key factors and logistics, that state administrators should consider are outlined.
Subject
Developmental and Educational Psychology,Education
Reference27 articles.
1. Alice Cogswell and Anne Sullivan Macy Act, H.R. 4822, 116th Cong. (2019). https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/4822/text
2. Babies Count. (n.d.). http://babiescount.org/
3. Barton E. E., Harris B., Leech N., Stiff L., Choi G., Joel T. (2016). An analysis of state autism education assessment practices and requirements. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 46, 737–748. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-015-2589-0
4. Barton L. R., Spiker D., Williamson C. (2012). Characterizing disability in head start programs: Not so clear cut. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 27, 596–612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2012.04.002
5. Birt L., Scott S., Cavers D., Campbell C., Walter F. (2016). Member checking: A tool to enhance trustworthiness or merely a nod to validation? Qualitative Health Research, 26(12), 1802–1811. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732316654870
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献