Affiliation:
1. Providence College
2. University of Southern Maine
3. University of the Pacific
Abstract
This study investigates how state departments of education are defining response to intervention (RTI) assessment processes as they relate to specific learning disability (SLD) eligibility 5 years after the Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) 2006 regulations were published. A qualitative research design of directed content analysis was used to examine each state's regulatory criteria for SLD and state guidance documents on the use of RTI for SLD identification. Best practices were identified in three areas: (a) frequency of data collection, (b) criteria for responsiveness, and (c) multidimensional assessment. Results showed no national consensus for how multidisciplinary teams should use RTI data as part of SLD identification. Implications for policy, practice, and future research are discussed.
Subject
Developmental and Educational Psychology,Education
Cited by
47 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献