A Prospective Clinical Trial Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Non-Animal Stabilized Hyaluronic Acid Injections for Non-Surgical Rhinoplasty

Author:

Nikolis Andreas12,Enright Kaitlyn M2ORCID,Nguyen Quynh23,Sinno Hani H.1,Cotofana Sebastian4ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Plastic Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

2. Erevna Innovations Inc, Clinical Research Unit, Westmount, Quebec, Canada

3. Université de Montréal, Département d'ophtalmologie, Montréal, Quebec, Canada

4. Department of Clinical Anatomy, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, MN, USA

Abstract

Background: Non-surgical rhinoplasty with hyaluronic acid (HA) filler is a three-dimensional reshaping technique that achieves tissue enhancement by placing HA deep to nasal skin. Due to its unique rheology, Restylane® Lyft (HA-L, Galderma, Uppsala, Sweden) may be particularly well-suited for injection rhinoplasty, as it has high gel firmness (G’) for strong structural support with minimal integration propensity. Methods: A prospective clinical trial was conducted to evaluate HA-L use for non-surgical rhinoplasty. Thirty-three females were observed over eight months, using the following schedule: Visit 1 = Baseline/Treatment 1; Visit 2 = Optional touch up (Week 2); Visits 3–6 = Follow-ups (Months 1,3,6,8). The primary endpoint was subject improvement at Month 1 assessed by a blinded evaluator using the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS). Subject satisfaction and adverse events (AEs) were also evaluated. Results: A deep, periosteal injection using a bolus technique and 0.34 cc of HA-L was most often used. Seven cases of positive aspiration occurred in 167 injection points (4.19%), among 6/33 (18.18%) subjects. Based on the GAIS, 100% of subjects met the primary endpoint. Subject satisfaction was maximal at Month 1 (100%) and largely maintained at Month 8 (78.57%). Besides expected injection-related AEs (eg, ecchymosis, erythema), immediate AEs during/following treatment were limited to presyncopal symptoms [5/33 subjects (15.15%)]. Importantly, no cases of ischemia were observed. Subject-reported AEs (eg, swelling, erythema, pain) dissipated within 2 to 7 days. Conclusion: Given the technical nature of this technique, HA-L may be well-suited for injection rhinoplasty, due to its strong safety and efficacy profile. Level of Evidence: Level III: Evidence obtained from well-designed cohort study.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Surgery

Reference20 articles.

1. Multiplane hyaluronic acid (EME) in female Chinese rhinoplasty using blunt and sharp needle technique

2. Non‐surgical rhinoplasty using hyaluronic acid dermal fillers: A systematic review

3. Psychological Analysis of Non-surgical Rhinoplasty

4. American Society of Plastic Surgeons. 2018 Plastic Surgery Statistics Report. https://www.plasticsurgery.org/documents/News/Statistics/2018/plastic-surgery-statistics-full-report-2018.pdf. Accessed January 15, 2023.

5. Augmentation Rhinoplasty Using Injectable Tissue-Engineered Soft Tissue

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3