Affiliation:
1. Institute for Criminal-Law Ethics and Criminology, Slovenia; University of Maribor, Slovenia
Abstract
Victims of crime have seen a significant shift in the criminal justice approaches towards them over time: from rather passive observers of the conflict between the state and the offender to more active agents whose thoughts, wishes and emotions are allowed to be voiced and whose participation is recognised as legitimate in its own right within the criminal process. The article analyses to what extent this empowerment shift is reflected in Slovenia, specifically how the criminal law acknowledges and defines the victim in the criminal justice setting. While the European Union (EU) legislation in this area, as a top-down factor in shaping the rights and status of the victim, has provided an important impetus for legislative changes, particularly in relation to certain aspects, rights and categories of crime victims, as well as the definition of the victim, the more conceptual recent transformations (e.g. an altered model of rape) arose out of changed societal sensitivities spurred by triggering events and a wider social and political context. Implications and outstanding challenges are discussed in the concluding section.
Reference57 articles.
1. Amnesty International (2021) NOVO! Sprememba opredelitve posilstva. Amnesty International Slovenia, 4 March. Available at: https://www.amnesty.si/novo-sprememba-opredelitve-posilstva-spomlad-2021 (accessed 1 December 2023).
2. Blagg RD (2019) Bystander effect. Encyclopedia Britannica, 7 January. Available at: https://www.britannica.com/topic/bystander-effect (accessed 1 December 2023).
3. Burgen S (2022) Spain passes ‘only yes means yes’ sexual consent law. The Guardian, 25 August. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/aug/25/spain-only-yes-means-yes-sexual-consent-bill-expected-to-become-law (accessed 1 December 2023).
4. Persistent Narratives of Force and Resistance: Affirmative Consent as Law Reform