Impact of disaggregated level clean electricity on CO2 emissions: Evidence from EU-5 countries by bivariate and multivariate QQ approaches

Author:

Kartal Mustafa Tevfik12345ORCID,Pata Ugur Korkut2467ORCID,Taşkın Dilvin89,Mukhtarov Shahriyar1011512

Affiliation:

1. Department of Finance and Banking, European University of Lefke, Lefke, Northern Cyprus, Mersin, Türkiye

2. Department of Economics, College of Political Science and Economics, Korea University, Seoul, South Korea

3. GUST Center for Sustainable Development, Gulf University for Science and Technology, Hawally, Kuwait

4. Clinic of Economics, Azerbaijan State University of Economics (UNEC), Baku, Azerbaijan

5. Department of Economics and Management, Khazar University, Baku, Azerbaijan

6. Department of Economics, Hatay Mustafa Kemal University, Hatay, Türkiye

7. Advance Research Centre, European University of Lefke, Lefke, Northern Cyprus, Mersin, Türkiye

8. Department of International Trade and Finance, Yaşar University, İzmir, Türkiye

9. Economic Research Center (WCERC), Western Caspian University, Baku, Azerbaijan

10. Department of Economics, Korea University, Seoul, South Korea

11. Faculty of Business and International Relations, Vistula University, Warsaw, Poland

12. BEU-Scientific Research Center, Baku Engineering University, Baku, Azerbaijan

Abstract

Considering the energy crisis in Europe and searching for alternatives, this study investigates the impact of clean electricity generation (EG) types on the environment. So, the study focuses on EU-5 countries (Germany-DEU, Spain-ESP, France-FRA, United Kingdom-GBR, and Italy-ITA), uses CO2 emissions as environmental indicator, and considers clean EG types as explanatory variables by controlling geopolitical risk. Accordingly, the study uses data from 2nd January 2019 to 29th February 2024 and applies bivariate and multivariate quantile-on-quantile regression (BQQ & MQQ) and Granger causality-in-quantiles (GCQ) as the fundamental approaches, while quantile regression (QR) is performed for the consistency check. The outcomes reveal that (i) hydro EG increases CO2 emissions across countries excluding DEU at lower and middle quantiles; (ii) solar EG curbs CO2 emissions at middle quantiles in DEU, higher quantiles in ESP and FRA, and middle and higher quantiles in ITA; (iii) wind EG has an almost decreasing impact across quantiles excluding higher quantiles in DEU and FRA; (iv) clean EG types are almost causally impactful on CO2 emissions across quantiles; (v) geopolitical risk decreases the power of the impact of clean EG alternatives on CO2 emissions, but does not change them in a reverse way. To sum up, the impact of clean EG types on CO2 emissions in EU-5 countries varies across EG types, quantiles, and countries. Thus, the study suggests that wind EG is highly beneficial for all EU-5 countries, while there is also room for growth to benefit from hydro and solar EG for some countries.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3