Affiliation:
1. Umeå University, Sweden
Abstract
Today intersectionality has expanded from being primarily a metaphor within structuralist feminist research to an all-encompassing theory. This article discusses this increasing dedication to intersectionality in European feminist research. How come intersectionality has developed into a signifier for ‘good feminist research’ at this particular point in time? Drawing on poststructuralist and postcolonial theory the authors examine key articles on intersectionality as well as special issues devoted to the concept. They interrogate the conflicts and meaning making processes as well as the genealogies of the concept. Thus, the epistemology and ontology behind the ‘intersectional turn’ in feminist theory is the main concern here. The authors argue that the lack of ontological discussions has lead to its very popularity. Intersectionality promises almost everything: to provide complexity, overcome divisions and to serve as a critical tool. However, the expansion of the scope of intersectionality has created a consensus that conceals fruitful and necessary conflicts within feminism.
Subject
Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Gender Studies
Cited by
192 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. The Race-Gender-Equity-Leadership Matrix: Intersectionality and Its Application in Higher Education Literature;Journal of Black Studies;2024-07-25
2. Contents;X-Texte zu Kultur und Gesellschaft;2024-06-04
3. Frontmatter;X-Texte zu Kultur und Gesellschaft;2024-06-04
4. Bibliography;X-Texte zu Kultur und Gesellschaft;2024-06-04
5. Illustrations;X-Texte zu Kultur und Gesellschaft;2024-06-04