Supporting Canadian Nursing Students to Write the NCLEX-RN Exam: A Three-Phased Mixed Methods Descriptive Design

Author:

Gaudet Julie1ORCID,Thibeault Catherine2,Betts Lorraine1,Mastrilli Paula1,Saeed Dalia2,Ilyin Nicole1

Affiliation:

1. Sally Horsfall Eaton School of Nursing, George Brown College, Toronto, Canada

2. Trent/Fleming School of Nursing, Trent University, Peterborough, Canada

Abstract

Background In 2015, the College of Nurses of Ontario, replaced the Canadian Registered Nurse Examination with the NCLEX-RN exam as entry-to-practice. Faculty in a college-university partnership searched for products to provide nursing students with focused practice in writing exams modelled on the Canadian NCLEX-RN test plan. Purpose The aim of this three-phased evaluation study was to test and validate NCLEX-RN exam preparation materials newly developed for the Canadian context. Methods A mixed methods descriptive design was used to capture subjective perspectives and objective measures. After ethical approval was obtained, 13 students assessed the e-learning platform's usability. Eight faculty/clinical experts assessed the content validity of materials using a content validity index (CVI) at both item (I-CVI), and scale (S-CVI) levels. Lastly, 72 completed tests served as the basis for assessing psychometric properties of selected test items. Results Materials were assessed as useful and easy to use and navigate. I-CVIs ranged between 0.5 to 1.0 with none falling below 0.5 while S-CVIs were above the standard for acceptability of greater than 0.8 with none falling below 0.9. Overall test reliability measured by the Kuder-Richardson formula was 0.73. Many items assessed for difficulty (64%) showed a proportion of correct responses within desired ranges, and most point-biserial indices ranged from fair to very good. Conclusion Strong evidence supported the usability and content validity of the materials assessed. Item difficulty and discrimination analyses were within acceptable ranges. Suggestions for improvements were offered. Predictive analysis should form the basis of future research in this area.

Funder

Voucher for Innovation and Productivity (VIPI): Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) Engage Partnership

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Nursing

Reference58 articles.

1. Using thematic analysis in psychology

2. One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis?

3. Canadian Council of Registered Nurse Regulators. (2021). NCLEX-RN 2020: Canadian and international results. http://www.ccrnr.ca/assets/ccrnr-nclex-rn-2020-canadian-and-international-results-en.pdf.pdf

4. Canadian Council of Registered Nurse Regulators. (2017, May 11). NCLEX-RN 2016: Canadian results. http://www.ccrnr.ca/assets/nclex-rn-2016-canadian-results.pdf

5. Canadian Nurses Association. (2016, March 7). 2015 NCLEX-RN results signal several major issues with nurse licensing exam [Press Release]. https://www.cnaaiic.ca/en/news-room/news-releases/2016/2015-nclex-rn-results-signal-several-major-issues-with-nurse-licensing-exam

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3