Leading Pedestrian Intervals at Urban Crosswalks: Effects on Safety for Travelers Who Are Blind

Author:

Bourquin Eugene A.1,Bieder Joy2,Wall Emerson Robert3ORCID,Franck Lukas4

Affiliation:

1. Bourquin Consulting, New York, NY, USA

2. Independent Contractor, Bronxville, NY, USA

3. Department of Blindness and Low Vision Studies, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, MI, USA

4. The Seeing Eye, Morristown, NJ, USA

Abstract

Introduction: The use of leading pedestrian intervals (LPIs) creates safer street crossings for typical pedestrians, giving them a head-start into the crosswalk. The LPI, however, delays the onset of the traditional traffic sound cue that pedestrians who are blind use to initiate crossing streets. LPIs can create situations where pedestrians who are blind will frequently begin or end crossings or both against the pedestrian signal. Methods: The researchers conducted two sets of observations in an urban environment. They measured the seconds from the initiation of the vehicular circular green signal to the front of the first vehicle passing through the center of the intersection (n = 40) to calculate the average driver's delay. Pedestrians who are blind, to confirm a straight-through surge of parallel traffic (i.e. not turning vehicles), listen for a vehicle to reach the roadway center to know it is the appropriate time to initiate a crossing. In the second set of observations (n = 40), the researchers recorded the length of the Walk, Flashing Don’t Walk, and LPI to calculate average impacts on crossing. Results: The average time for vehicles to reach the center of the intersection was 6.0 s. When there was an LPI, on average the clearance for pedestrians after reaching the far corner was 0.49 s; for Walk intervals, there was an average of 3.35 s margin of time to begin crossing. Discussion: These observational studies verify the crossing latencies for pedestrians who are blind. At crosswalks with LPI, pedestrians can be expected to cross after the Walk sign has expired 15 to 38% of the time and end their crossing 40 to 82% of the time when the visual display says Don’t Walk. Implications for Practitioners: Orientation and mobility specialists should instruct students on how to identify intersections with LPI to assist in decision making. Traffic management remediation is the installation of an accessible pedestrian signal (APS); specialists should advocate for the installation of APS where LPIs are implemented and teach students how to use APS.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Rehabilitation,Ophthalmology

Reference31 articles.

1. Banerjee I., Shladover S. E., Misener J. A., Chan C.Y., Ragland D. R. (2004). Impact of pedestrian presence on movement of left-turning vehicles: Method, preliminary results & possible use in intersection decision support. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5k97v780

2. Barlow J. M. (2021, March). Expert witness, amended proposed remedial plan (Sworn testimony, Federal Case 1:18-cv-05792-PAE Document 143). United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.

3. Blind Pedestrians and the Changing Technology and Geometry of Signalized Intersections: Safety, Orientation, and Independence

4. Pedestrian Clearance Intervals at Modern Intersections: Implications for the Safety of Pedestrians who are Visually Impaired

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3