Bridging the Gap of Graphical Information Accessibility in Education With Multimodal Touchscreens Among Students With Blindness and Low Vision

Author:

Tennison Jennifer L.1,Goswami Spondita2,Hairston Jesse R.3,Merlin Drews P.4,Smith Derrick W.5,Giudice Nicholas A.6,Stefik Andreas4,Gorlewicz Jenna L.1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO, USA

2. Department of Psychology, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO, USA

3. Center for Cybersecurity Research and Education, University of Alabama in Huntsville, Huntsville, AL, USA

4. Department of Computer Science, University of Nevada Las Vegas, Las Vegas, NV, USA

5. Department of Education, University of Alabama in Huntsville, Huntsville, AL, USA

6. VEMI Lab & Department of Psychology, University of Maine, Orono, ME, USA

Abstract

Introduction: Informational graphics and data representations (e.g., charts and figures) are critical for accessing educational content. Novel technologies, such as the multimodal touchscreen which displays audio, haptic, and visual information, are promising for being platforms of diverse means to access digital content. This work evaluated educational graphics rendered on a touchscreen compared to the current standard for accessing graphical content. Method: Three bar charts and geometry figures were evaluated on student ( N = 20) ability to orient to and extract information from the touchscreen and print. Participants explored the graphics and then were administered a set of questions (11–12 depending on graphic group). In addition, participants’ attitudes using the mediums were assessed. Results: Participants performed statistically significantly better on questions assessing information orientation using the touchscreen than print for both bar chart and geometry figures. No statistically significant difference in information extraction ability was found between mediums on either graphic type. Participants responded significantly more favorably to the touchscreen than the print graphics, indicating them as more helpful, interesting, fun, and less confusing. Discussion: Accessing and orienting to information was highly successful by participants using the touchscreen, and was the preferred means of accessing graphical information when compared to the print image for both geometry figures and bar charts. This study highlights challenges in presenting graphics both on touchscreens and in print. Implications for Practitioners: This study offers preliminary support for the use of multimodal, touchscreen tablets as educational tools. Student ability using touchscreen-based graphics seems to be comparable to traditional types of graphics (large print and embossed, tactile graphics), although further investigation may be necessary for tactile graphic users. In summary, educators of students with blindness and visual impairments should consider ways to utilize new technologies, such as touchscreens, to provide more diverse access to graphical information.

Funder

National Science Foundation

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Reference22 articles.

1. American Thermoform. (2018). Swell touch paper. http://www.americanthermoform.com/product/swell-touch-paper

2. Braille Authority of North America (BANA). (2010). Guidelines and standards for tactile graphics. http://www.brailleauthority.org/tg/index.html

3. 3-D Finite-Element Models of Human and Monkey Fingertips to Investigate the Mechanics of Tactile Sense

4. What Mathematical Images Are in a Typical Mathematics Textbook? Implications for Students with Visual Impairments

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3