Taming Big Data

Author:

Bail Christopher A.1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Sociology, Duke University, NC, USA

Abstract

Social media websites such as Facebook and Twitter provide an unprecedented amount of qualitative data about organizations and collective behavior. Yet these new data sources lack critical information about the broader social context of collective behavior—or protect it behind strict privacy barriers. In this article, I introduce social media survey apps (SMSAs) that adjoin computational social science methods with conventional survey techniques in order to enable more comprehensive analysis of collective behavior online. SMSAs (1) request large amounts of public and non-public data from organizations that maintain social media pages, (2) survey these organizations to collect additional data of interest to a researcher, and (3) return the results of a scholarly analysis back to these organizations as incentive for them to participate in social science research. SMSAs thus provide a highly efficient, cost-effective, and secure method for extracting detailed data from very large samples of organizations that use social media sites. This article describes how to design and implement SMSAs and discusses an application of this new method to study how nonprofit organizations attract public attention to their cause on Facebook. I conclude by evaluating the quality of the sample derived from this application of SMSAs and discussing the potential of this new method to study non-organizational populations on social media sites as well.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Sociology and Political Science,Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

Reference39 articles.

1. Andrews Kenneth, Hunter Anne, Edwards Bob. 2012. “Methodological Strategies for Examining Populations of Social Movement Organizations.” Working Paper, Department of Sociology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.

2. The cultural environment: measuring culture with big data

3. Terrified

4. Survey response rate levels and trends in organizational research

5. Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment

Cited by 20 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Untapped Potential: Designed Digital Trace Data in Online Survey Experiments;Sociological Methods & Research;2024-08-09

2. Ghosted: Challenges to Conducting Qualitative Research in the Digital Era;Journal of Contemporary Ethnography;2024-03-19

3. Instant Archives: Social Media and Social Movement Research;Methodological Advances in Research on Social Movements, Conflict, and Change;2023-07-12

4. Consequences of Social Listening via Mediated Communication Technologies (MCTs);International Journal of Social Media and Online Communities;2023-06-08

5. An integrated model for using social media applications in non-profit organizations;International Journal of Information Management;2022-04

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3