Affiliation:
1. Department of Sociology, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
2. Faculty of Industrial Design Engineering (IDE), and Faculty of Technology, Policy and Management (TPM), Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands
Abstract
Empirical studies on individual behaviour often, implicitly or explicitly, assume a single type of decision rule. Other studies do not specify behavioural assumptions at all. We advance sociological research by introducing (random) regret minimization, which is related to loss aversion, into the sociological literature and by testing it against (random) utility maximization, which is the most prominent decision rule in sociological research on individual behaviour. With an application to neighbourhood choice, in a sample of four European cities, we combine stated choice experiment data and discrete choice modelling techniques and find a considerable degree of decision rule-heterogeneity, with a strong prevalence of regret minimization and hence loss aversion. We also provide indicative evidence that decision rules can affect expected neighbourhood demand at the macro level. Our approach allows identifying heterogeneity in decision rules, that is, the degree of regret/loss aversion, at the level of choice attributes such as the share of foreigners when comparing neighbourhoods, and can improve sociological practice related to linking theories and social research on decision-making.
Funder
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
Subject
Sociology and Political Science,Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
Reference92 articles.
1. AAPOR. 2016. Standard Definitions: Final Dispositions of Case Codes and Outcome Rates for Surveys. 9th edn. Oakbrook Terrace: The American Association for Public Opinion Research.
2. Minority Proximity to Whites in Suburbs: An Individual-Level Analysis of Segregation
3. Multifactorial Experiments in Surveys
4. Relative risk aversion models: How plausible are their assumptions?