Affiliation:
1. University of California, Santa Barbara
Abstract
The process of completing any piece of empirical research requires that a large number of methodological decisions be made at each step in the undertaking. Some of these decisions are very clearly prescribed by conventional practice, while others allow for wide discretion. This paper discusses various kinds of discretionary decisions in applied research where special difficulties are necessarily produced by the requirement to speak to the needs of policy makers and other research users. Emphasizing the inevitable advocacy role of applied researchers, suggestions are provided for which kinds of discretionary methodological decisions in applied research should be encouraged and which should be condemned.
Subject
Sociology and Political Science,Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献