Generalization of Classic Question Order Effects Across Cultures

Author:

Stark Tobias H.1ORCID,Silber Henning2ORCID,Krosnick Jon A.3ORCID,Blom Annelies G.4,Aoyagi Midori5,Belchior Ana6ORCID,Bosnjak Michael7ORCID,Clement Sanne Lund8ORCID,John Melvin9,Jónsdóttir Guðbjörg Andrea10ORCID,Lawson Karen11,Lynn Peter12ORCID,Martinsson Johan13,Shamshiri-Petersen Ditte8ORCID,Tvinnereim Endre14ORCID,Yu Ruoh-rong15

Affiliation:

1. Utrecht University/ICS, Utrecht, the Netherlands

2. Department of Survey Design and Methodology, GESIS--Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences, Mannheim, Germany

3. Departments of Communication, Political Science, and Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA

4. Department of Political Science and Collaborative Research Center 884 “Political Economy of Reforms,” University of Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany

5. Center for Social & Environmental Systems Research, National Institute for Environmental Studies, Japan

6. Department of Political Science and Public Policies, Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (University Institute of Lisbon), ISCTE-IUL, Lisbon, Portugal

7. ZPID - Leibniz Institute for Psychology Information, Trier, Germany

8. Department of Political Science, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark

9. Collaborative Research Center 884 “Political Economy of Reforms,” University of Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany

10. Social Science Research Institute, University of Iceland, Reykjavík, Iceland

11. Department of Psychology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada

12. Institute for Social and Economic Research, University of Essex, Colchester, UK

13. Department of Political Science, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden

14. Uni Research Rokkan Centre, Bergen, Norway

15. Center for Survey Research, Research Center for Humanities and Social Sciences, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan

Abstract

Questionnaire design is routinely guided by classic experiments on question form, wording, and context conducted decades ago. This article explores whether two question order effects (one due to the norm of evenhandedness and the other due to subtraction or perceptual contrast) appear in surveys of probability samples in the United States and 11 other countries (Canada, Denmark, Germany, Iceland, Japan, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Sweden, Taiwan, and the United Kingdom; N = 25,640). Advancing theory of question order effects, we propose necessary conditions for each effect to occur, and found that the effects occurred in the nations where these necessary conditions were met. Surprisingly, the abortion question order effect even appeared in some countries in which the necessary condition was not met, suggesting that the question order effect there (and perhaps elsewhere) was not due to subtraction or perceptual contrast. The question order effects were not moderated by education. The strength of the effect due to the norm of evenhandedness was correlated with various cultural characteristics of the nations. Strong support was observed for the form-resistant correlation hypothesis.

Funder

Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Sociology and Political Science,Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3