Reproducibility of SIMPLE classification for diabetic retinopathy screening and its comparison to current Italian guidelines

Author:

Donati Maria Carla12,Cifarelli Lorenzo12ORCID,Morelli Alberto13,Alonzo Ludovica12,Tartaro Ruggero1ORCID,Sasso Paola4,Maceroni Martina45ORCID,Minnella Angelo Maria45,Rizzo Stanislao45,Mannucci Edoardo67ORCID,Vitale Valentina67,Curran Katie8,Peto Tunde8,Giansanti Fabrizio12,Virgili Gianni12

Affiliation:

1. Department of NEUROFARBA, University of Florence, Firenze, Italy

2. Department of Ophthalmology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Firenze, Italy

3. Livorno Hospital, Eye clinic, Livorno, Italy

4. Department of Ophthalmology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy

5. Department of Ophthalmology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart - Rome Campus, Roma, Italy

6. Department of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences “Mario Serio”, University of Florence, Firenze, Italy

7. Department of Diabetology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Firenze, Italy

8. Centre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK

Abstract

Purpose To evaluate the reproducibility of SIMPLE (Single field Image Multi Parameters defined Lesions Extent), a new Diabetic Retinopathy (DR) classification for screening of 45° single field fundus pictures of patients with diabetes (PwDM), assessing DR, Diabetic Maculopathy (DMac) and referral rate agreement and comparing it to current Italian Guidelines (IG). Materials and methods We conducted a retrospective, observational, multicentre study, collecting 1000 retinal 45° single field images of PwDM obtained during routine visits in two diabetes clinics. Three ophthalmologists evaluated each image, determining the presence and number of specific DR lesions and then assigning a stage according to the current IG for screening. SIMPLE staging was performed automatically via Excel software, based on the pre-specified DR characteristics observed by the graders. We analysed intra-centre, inter-centre and total inter-grader agreement for DR and DMac stage and referral rate of the two classifications. Results Agreement amongst the three graders was consistently higher when using SIMPLE classification than when using current IG classification. For DR, kappa (k) was 0.86 with IG and 0.95 with SIMPLE classification; for DMac, k-IG was 0.78, while k-SIMPLE was 0.96; concordance on the referral rate was 0.91 with IG and 0.99 with SIMPLE. Similar results were obtained in sub-analyses for the evaluation of intra-centre and inter-centre concordance. Conclusions Our results suggest that the new SIMPLE classification has an excellent reproducibility amongst graders, comparable or superior to the current IG for DR screening proposed in 2015, improving the standardisation of the decision on referability.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3