Refractive error after combined phaco-vitrectomy: A multicentric study

Author:

Kilian Raphael1ORCID,Crincoli Emanuele23ORCID,Rizzo Clara1ORCID,Ripa Matteo23ORCID,Faraldi Francesco4,Lavia Carlo5,Tartaro Ruggero6ORCID,Ceruti Piero1,Casini Giamberto7,Rizzo Stanislao23,Savastano Alfonso23

Affiliation:

1. Ophthalmic Unit, Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy

2. Ophthalmology Unit, “Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS”, Rome, Italy

3. Catholic University of “Sacro Cuore”, Rome, Italy

4. Azienda Ospedaliera ordine Mauriziano, Turin, Italy

5. Surgical Department, Ophthalmology Service, Azienda Sanitaria Locale TO5, Chieri, Italy

6. Department of NEUROFARBA, Ophthalmology, University of Florence, Careggi, Florence, Italy

7. Ophthalmology Unit, Department of Surgical, Medical, Molecular Pathology and Emergency, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy

Abstract

Purpose To study the post-operative refractive error (RE) of patients undergoing combined phaco-vitrectomy and to find out which intraocular lens (IOL)-power formula had the best refractive outcomes. Methods In this retrospective multicentric study we compared the preoperative expected target with the postoperative RE of patients undergoing combined phaco-vitrectomy due to vitreomacular traction, macular pucker, full thickness macular hole or lamellar macular hole. A multinomial logistic regression was performed to compare the postoperative REs and the differences between expected and postoperative REs among the SRK-T, Olsen's and Holladay-2 formulas. The correlation between the difference in REs and IOL-power was also studied. Results Sixty-seven eyes with a mean axial length of 23.73 ± 1.21 mm were included. Forty-two (63%), 14 (21%) and 11 (16%) eyes were implanted with an IOL that was calculated respectively with SRK-T, Olsen's and the Holladay-2 formula. The mean preoperative expected- and post-operative REs were −0.16 ± 0.12D and −0.48 ± 0.17, respectively ( p = 0.045). SRK-T and Holladay-2 formulas led to a significant myopic shift whereas Olsen's caused a significant hyperopic error, independently from the IOL power. Conclusion Independently from the IOL power, none of the analyzed formulas is precise at calculating the post-operative RE.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Ophthalmology,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3