Static Threshold Visual Field in Glaucoma with the Fastpac™ Algorithm of the Humphrey Field Analyser is the Gain in Examination Time Offset by Any Loss of Information?

Author:

Nordmann J.P.1,Denis PH.1,Nguer Y.1,Mouton-Chopin D.1,Saraux H.1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Ophthalmology, Hôpital Tenon, Paris - France

Abstract

A new algorithm (Fastpac™) has been designed to speed up full threshold tests with the Humphrey Field Analyser. We studied the utility of this algorithm by comparing central 24-2 threshold programs obtained with standard and Fastpac™ algorithms in 43 hypertensive or glaucomatous eyes. The Fastpac™ reduced testing time by 35% to 45%. In glaucomatous eyes, the time spared was inversely correlated with the degree of visual field impairment. Global indices were used to compare visual fields. Mean absolute differences in indices did not exceed 0.98 dB. Correlations between indices in glaucoma patients with standard and Fastpac™ strategy were respectively 0.99 and 0.98 for mean deviation and pattern standard deviation. The intra-test variability (short-term fluctuation) was slightly higher with Fastpac™ with a lower correlation between algorithms (r=0.62). The use of Fastpac™ achieves a mean time reduction of 40% and does not significantly modify global indices obtained with the Humphrey perimeter in hypertensive and glaucomatous eyes.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Ophthalmology,General Medicine

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Comparison of global indices and test duration between two visual field analyzers: Octopus 300 and Topcon SBP-3000;Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology;2012-01-25

2. Visual field theory and methods;Becker-Shaffer's Diagnosis and Therapy of the Glaucomas;2009

3. Progression of visual field loss in open angle glaucoma in the Melbourne Visual Impairment Project;Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology;2006-01

4. Situations cliniques particulières chez le glaucomateux;Journal Français d'Ophtalmologie;2004-06

5. Comparison between tendency-oriented perimetry (TOP) and octopus threshold perimetry;Ophthalmology;2000-01

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3