Expert consensus on the management of patients undergoing cataract surgery: A Delphi study

Author:

Orfeo Vincenzo1,Aragona Pasquale2ORCID,Alessio Giovanni3,Drago Lorenzo4,Mastropasqua Leonardo5,Rossi Scipione6,Vinciguerra Paolo7ORCID,Ciprandi Giorgio8ORCID,Tognetto Daniele9

Affiliation:

1. Ophthalmology Unit, Clinica Mediterranea, Naples, Italy

2. Ophthalmology Clinic, University of Messina, Messina, Italy

3. Ophthalmology Clinic, Neuroscience Department, University of Bari, Bari, Italy

4. Clinical Microbiology, Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy

5. Ophthalmology Clinic, National Center of High Technology in Ophthalmology, University “G. d’Annunzio”, Chieti-Pescara, Italy

6. Ophthalmology and Ocular Microbiology, San Carlo Nancy Hospital, Rome, Italy

7. Eye Center Unit, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy

8. Outpatients Department, Casa di Cura Villa Montallegro, Genoa, Italy

9. Ophthalmology Clinic, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy

Abstract

Purpose To define the management of patients undergoing cataract surgery. Setting Panel of experts on cataract surgery and members of the Italian Association of Cataract and Refractive Surgery (AICCER) participated in the Delphi study. Design A restricted panel of experts defined the statements concerning the topic and identified a larger panel of experts who voted the statements. The statements concerned a series of practical issues concerning the management of patients undergoing cataract surgery. Methods An initial web round-table served to develop the statements. The larger panel was constituted by 15 experts which anonymously voted the statements, presented in a web platform, using a 5- point Likert scale. Consensus was defined as at least 80% of agreement. Results All participants completed the questionnaire. Globally, the total percentage of agreement of all statements was 90.4%. The total mean score was 4.5. Score 4 and score 5 accounted for the 27% and the 68% of the total votes, respectively. Conclusions The participants felt they could largely agree with and approve the statements proposed by the board. In addition, the Delphi study identified some points that are highly shared and endorsed. In particular, a new model approach can be based on a seven-day course using a fixed high-potency corticosteroid combination with a broad-spectrum antibiotic. At the end of this cycle, the patient should be re-evaluated in some way to continue any treatment in the most appropriate and personalized way possible.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Ophthalmology,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3