Simultaneous bilateral or sequential DCR? What to choose?

Abstract

Background: Dacryocystorhinostomy is used to treat nasolacrimal duct obstruction when conservative measures fail. It may be performed via an external or endoscopic-endonasal approach. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of patients with nasolacrimal duct obstruction treated with simultaneous bilateral or unilateral dacryocystorhinostomy. Methods: The database of a tertiary medical center was retrospectively reviewed for all patients treated for nasolacrimal duct obstruction in 2012–2017. The study sample was divided into six groups by surgery type and approach: adults (>18 years) – external or endoscopic-endonasal sequential unilateral or simultaneous bilateral dacryocystorhinostomy (four subgroups); children (18 years) – endoscopic-endonasal unilateral or simultaneous bilateral dacryocystorhinostomy (two subgroups). Data were collected on patient age and sex, surgery and anesthesia type and duration, and complications. Results: The cohort included 95 adults and 27 children who underwent 111 and 41 surgical procedures, respectively. Among the adults, the durations of anesthesia and surgery were significantly longer in the external bilateral dacryocystorhinostomy group than the others, but no such differences were found between simultaneous bilateral endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy and unilateral dacryocystorhinostomy by either approach. Among the children, there was no significant between-group difference in surgery duration. In neither age population was bilateral endoscopic surgery associated with an excess of intraoperative or postoperative complications of hemorrhage, infection, and epiphora. Conclusion: The lack of intergroup differences in clinical, surgical, and outcome parameters suggests that in cases of bilateral nasolacrimal duct obstruction in adults and children, simultaneous bilateral endoscopic-endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy may yield excellent therapeutic results.