Specialization in Social Work Practice

Author:

Blom Bj÷rn1

Affiliation:

1. UmeÂUniversity, Sweden

Abstract

• Summary: Specialization in social work practice is increasing in many countries at the same time as textbooks argue for generalist practice. Is there any empirical evidence for one or the other of these approaches? This article discusses generalist and specialist practice, theoretically as well as empirically, by presenting a study of a personal social services organization in Sweden. • Findings: The article demonstrates advantages as well as disadvantages of specialization for clients and social workers, and concludes that it is the work with clients within the personal social services which, to a large extent, demands that the social worker is a generalist. An outline structure for an alternative personal social services organization is postulated. • Applications: It is argued that the alternative structure could 1) satisfy the need for generalist and specialist competence respectively, and 2) facilitate harmony between social workers’ professional needs and administrative requirements for management and resource allocation.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Health (social science)

Reference13 articles.

1. Bergmark, Å. and Lundström, T. (1998) ‘Metoder i socialt arbete’ [Methods in Social Work] . Socialvetenskaplig Tidskrift 5: 291–314 .

2. Blom, B. (2001) ‘The Personal Social Services in a Swedish Quasi-market Context’ , Policy and Politics 1: 29–42 .

3. Bowes, A. M. and Dar, N. S. (2000) ‘Researching Social Care for Minority Ethnic Older People: Implications of Some Scottish Research’ , British Journal of Social Work 3: 305–321 .

4. Cohen, M. B. (1998) ‘Perceptions of Power in Client/Worker Relationships’ , Families in Society 4: 433–442 .

5. Fanshel, D. (1976) ‘Status Changes of Children in Foster Care: Final Results of the Columbia University Longitudinal Study’ , Child Welfare 55: 143–171 .

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3