Affiliation:
1. UmeÂUniversity, Sweden
Abstract
• Summary: Specialization in social work practice is increasing in many countries at the same time as textbooks argue for generalist practice. Is there any empirical evidence for one or the other of these approaches? This article discusses generalist and specialist practice, theoretically as well as empirically, by presenting a study of a personal social services organization in Sweden. • Findings: The article demonstrates advantages as well as disadvantages of specialization for clients and social workers, and concludes that it is the work with clients within the personal social services which, to a large extent, demands that the social worker is a generalist. An outline structure for an alternative personal social services organization is postulated. • Applications: It is argued that the alternative structure could 1) satisfy the need for generalist and specialist competence respectively, and 2) facilitate harmony between social workers’ professional needs and administrative requirements for management and resource allocation.
Subject
Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Health (social science)
Reference13 articles.
1. Bergmark, Å. and Lundström, T. (1998) ‘Metoder i socialt arbete’ [Methods in Social Work] . Socialvetenskaplig Tidskrift 5: 291–314 .
2. Blom, B. (2001) ‘The Personal Social Services in a Swedish Quasi-market Context’ , Policy and Politics 1: 29–42 .
3. Bowes, A. M. and Dar, N. S. (2000) ‘Researching Social Care for Minority Ethnic Older People: Implications of Some Scottish Research’ , British Journal of Social Work 3: 305–321 .
4. Cohen, M. B. (1998) ‘Perceptions of Power in Client/Worker Relationships’ , Families in Society 4: 433–442 .
5. Fanshel, D. (1976) ‘Status Changes of Children in Foster Care: Final Results of the Columbia University Longitudinal Study’ , Child Welfare 55: 143–171 .
Cited by
39 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献