Affiliation:
1. Swiss Forum for Migration and Population Studies, University of Neuchâtel, Switzerland
Abstract
This article investigates the recent flurry of state-level legislation regarding female genital mutilation (FGM), which occurred in the aftermath of the first federal criminal court case of FGM in 2017. Drawing on publicly available material, it shows how this court case, which involved a group of Muslims of Indian heritage, elicited a moral crusade against FGM, largely led by Republican lawmakers, and spurred a resurgence of anti-Muslim discourses, which first came to the fore after 9/11 to legitimate the “war on terror.” Although FGM is not an Islamic practice and is also carried out by non-Muslim groups, the author concludes that femonationalism and anti-Muslim racism are important analytical lens for understanding the recent history of legislative efforts to combat FGM in the U.S.
Funder
Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
Subject
Law,Sociology and Political Science,Gender Studies
Reference73 articles.
1. Do Muslim Women Need Saving?
2. AHA Foundation. (2019). Representative Heather Sirocki of Maine and why the bill against female genital mutilation keeps being shot down in her state. Retrieved September 8, 2020, from https://www.theahafoundation.org/representative-heather-sirocki-of-maine-and-why-the-bill-against-female-genital-mutilation-keeps-being-shot-down-in-her-state/
3. AHA Foundation. (n.d.). FGM legislation by state. Retrieved August 23, 2020, from https://www.theahafoundation.org/female-genital-mutilation/fgm-legislation-by-state/
4. The racialization of Muslim veils: A philosophical analysis
5. Picturing female circumcision and female genital cosmetic surgery: a visual framing analysis of Swiss newspapers, 1983–2015
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献