The Need for Experimental Methodology in Intimate Partner Violence: Finding Programs That Effectively Prevent IPV-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

The Need for Experimental Methodology in Intimate Partner Violence: Finding Programs That Effectively Prevent IPV

Published:2011-03 Issue:3 Volume:17 Page:340-358
ISSN:1077-8012
Container-title:Violence Against Women
language:en
Short-container-title:Violence Against Women

Author:

Feder Lynette¹,Holditch Niolon Phyllis²,Campbell Jacquelyn³,Wallinder Jan⁴,Nelson Robin⁴,Larrouy Hattie⁴

Affiliation:

1. Portland State University,

2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of Violence Prevention

3. Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing

4. Multnomah County Health Department

Abstract

The lack of rigorous evaluations of intimate partner violence (IPV) programs has severely limited our knowledge about what works. However, IPV programs can be rigorously evaluated through randomized controlled trials (RCTs) conducted ethically and safely. This article provides an example of how a RCT to test an IPV preventive intervention—the Enhanced Nurse Family Partnership Study ( ENFPS)—was successfully implemented by a partnership of researchers and practitioners. The article concludes with some recommendations, arrived at by the researchers and practitioners on the ENFPS team, for achieving a successful collaboration thought to be essential in executing a field experiment.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Law,Sociology and Political Science,Gender Studies

Link

http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1077801211398620

Reference64 articles.

1. Less is more: Meta-analyses of sensitivity and attachment interventions in early childhood.

2. Causality and control: threats to internal validity

3. Is the Wish to Participate in a Cancer Rehabilitation Program an Indicator of the Need? Comparisons of Participants and Non-Participants in a Randomized Study

4. Boruch. R. ( 1975) On common contentions about randomized field experiments . In R. Boruch & H. W. Reicken (Eds.), Experimental testing of public policy (pp. 107-145). Washington, DC: Social Sciences Research Council.

5. Randomized Experiments for Planning and Evaluation

Cited by 19 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Training Informal Supporters to Improve Responses to Victim-Survivors of Domestic Violence and Abuse: A Systematic Review;Trauma, Violence, & Abuse;2023-08-31

2. Ethically Driven and Methodologically Tailored: Setting the Agenda for Systematic Reviews in Domestic Violence and Abuse;Journal of Family Violence;2023-04-03

3. PROTOCOL: Informal social support interventions for improving outcomes for victim‐survivors of domestic violence and abuse: An evidence and gap map;Campbell Systematic Reviews;2022-06-30

4. What’s In It for Me? Motivating the Untreated Abuser to Consider Treatment;Journal of Family Violence;2022-03-04

5. Follow-up Evaluation of Psychotherapy Protocols for Women with a History of Intimate Partner Violence: Scoping Review;Trends in Psychology;2021-11-24