Comparison of the CEL and ALE approaches for the simulation of orthogonal cutting of 15-5PH and 42CrMo4 materials

Author:

Aridhi Abderrahmen1ORCID,Perard Thomas1,Valiorgue Frederic1,Courbon Cédric1,Rech Joel1ORCID,Brosse Alexandre2,Girinon Mathieu3,Truffart Bertrand4,Karaouni Habib5

Affiliation:

1. Université de Lyon, Ecole Centrale de Lyon - ENISE, LTDS, UMR CNRS 5513, Saint Etienne, France

2. Framatome, Lyon, France

3. Cetim, Saint-Etienne, France

4. Airbus Helicopters, Laboratoire Materiaux Procds, Aeroport Marseille Provence, Marignane, France

5. SAFRAN Tech, Magny-les-Hameaux, France

Abstract

The modeling of cutting processes by the finite element method represents a great challenge for scientific researchers. Indeed, the plastic strain and strain rate in cutting induce a high risk of mesh distortion, especially for models based on a Lagrangian formulation which were the first to be developed. To overcome this problem other formulations, such as the Arbitrary Eulerian-Lagrangian (ALE), which is a combination of the classical formulations (Eulerian and Lagrangian), have been developed. Despite very interesting results in the simulation of orthogonal cutting, the implementation of this type of model remains delicate, and in particular the choice of initial geometrical conditions which can lead to a sudden stop of the calculation induced by a mesh distortion. To overcome these limitations, the Coupled Eulerian-Lagrangian (CEL) approach has been developed to simulate the orthogonal cutting process. In this paper, the CEL and ALE approaches were compared to simulate the orthogonal cutting process. The first objective was to compare the quality of the predicted physical quantities (forces, chips) over a wide range of cutting speeds and cutting thicknesses for two different materials. The second objective was to evaluate the time required for a complete simulation, integrating the time to set up the initial conditions (chip geometry) and finally the computation time of the machining operation. This work has shown that ALE and CEL formulations lead to very similar quantitative results that are pretty close to the experimental results. The ALE formulation has the advantage of having a reduced computation time compared to the CEL formulation. However, the preparation of the simulation is easy and robust for the CEL, whereas the selection of initial geometrical conditions for the ALE calculation requires several trials and errors before finding stable conditions. The CEL formulation is therefore a solution to be favored when launching several simulations in an automated way thanks to its reliability.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering,Mechanical Engineering

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3