Perceived job quality in the United States, Great Britain, Norway and West Germany, 1989-2005

Author:

Olsen Karen M.1,Kalleberg Arne L.2,Nesheim Torstein3

Affiliation:

1. Norges Handelshøyskole, Bergen, Norway,

2. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA

3. Samfunns- og næringslivsforskning, Bergen, Norway

Abstract

This article examines cross-national differences and trends in perceived job quality, defined in terms of five dimensions — extrinsic rewards, intrinsic rewards, work intensity, working conditions and interpersonal relationships — as well as overall job satisfaction. We analyse country differences in 1989, 1997 and 2005, using data for four countries from the International Social Survey Programme. Job security, the ability to work independently and the quality of working conditions and interpersonal relationships tend to be greater in Norway and West Germany than in the USA and Great Britain; American workers tend to be most satisfied with advancement opportunities, intrinsic rewards and overall job quality. We find convergence in job in security and work intensity over time, which may reflect increased market pressures that encourage a ‘lean and mean’ management strategy.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Management of Technology and Innovation,Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Strategy and Management,General Business, Management and Accounting

Reference34 articles.

1. Barth, E. and Ringdal, K. ( 2005) ‘Fleksibel arbeidsorganisering 1997-2003’ , in H. Torp (ed.) Nytt Arbeidsliv: Medvirkning, inkludering og belønning, pp. 35-54. Oslo : Gyldendal Akademisk.

2. Batt, R. ( 2005) ‘Introduction’, in S. Ackroyd, R. Batt, P. Thompson and P.S. Tolbert (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Work & Organization, pp. 19-30. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

3. Labor and Monopoly Capital

4. National Employment Systems and Job Autonomy: Why Job Autonomy is High in the Nordic Countries and Low in the United States, Canada, and Australia

Cited by 64 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3