Practitioners’ Self-Evaluations of Contrasting Types of Professional Development

Author:

Dunst Carl J.1,Raab Melinda2

Affiliation:

1. Orelena Hawks Puckett Institute, Asheville, North Carolina,

2. Orelena Hawks Puckett Institute, Asheville, North Carolina

Abstract

The effects of three types of in-service training on practitioners’ self-evaluations of evidence-based preschool classroom practices were evaluated in a study of 255 participants from 26 states. Participants attended either conference presentations or 1-day or 2- to 3-day workshops or received one of two types of intensive in-service training (weeklong institutes or on-site training in the participants’ classrooms). Study participants made self-ratings of the usefulness of the training content and the extent to which the training changed or improved their classroom practices, 1 or 6 months after training. Results show that both types of intensive in-service training are more effective than either conference presentations or workshops and that on-site training is more effective than weeklong institutes in affecting study participants’ judgments of the in-service training. The findings are discussed in terms of the characteristics of in-service training most likely to change or improve preschool classroom practices.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,Developmental and Educational Psychology,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

Cited by 30 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Increasing the Impact of Professional Development in Writing;Instructional Leadership Efforts and Evidence-Based Practices to Improve Writing Instruction;2023-10-27

2. A Systematic Review of The Relationship Between Industry 4.0 Application and Performance Improvement;2023 International Conference on Smart Applications, Communications and Networking (SmartNets);2023-07-25

3. The Understanding of Effective Professional Development of Mathematics Teachers According to South Sudan School Context;Education Sciences;2023-05-16

4. Characteristics of research into professional learning across professions: A mapping review;Review of Education;2023-04-26

5. What Do We Know About Professional Learning in Early Years Education? Findings from a Systematic Review;International Perspectives on Early Childhood Education and Development;2023

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3