Comparison of Isoprenaline with Adrenaline as Components of Epidural Test Dose Solutions for Halothane Anaesthetized Children

Author:

Tyagi A.1,Sethi A. K.1,Chatterji C.1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, University College of Medical Sciences & GTB Hospital, Shahadra, India

Abstract

In this randomized controlled trial we studied the haemodynamic effects of intravenous injection of lignocaine 1 mg/kg with either no additive, isoprenaline 0.05 μg or 0.075 μg/kg, or adrenaline 0.5 μg/kg in children anaesthetized with halothane. An increase of 10 bpm in heart rate or 20% rise in blood pressure was taken as a positive test response. Adrenaline was confirmed to be an unreliable marker with a positive test in only 67% of cases. For both doses of isoprenaline, the heart rate changes produced a positive test in 100% of cases. There was no statistically significant difference between the two doses of isoprenaline in regard to mean maximum increase in heart rate, mean time of beginning, ending or duration of positive test response and mean time to reach peak heart rate. The positive test response began between 10 and 50 seconds and lasted for an average of 69±54 seconds with the lower dose of isoprenaline 0.05 μg/kg. No advantage could be seen with the higher dose of isoprenaline. Change in blood pressure was not a useful criterion to detect intravascular injection. Recommendations for the use of isoprenaline as a marker of intravascular injection during regional blockade must be deferred until the safety of this agent's effect on neurological tissue is confirmed.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine,Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. The Epidural Test Dose: A Review;Anesthesia & Analgesia;2006-03

2. Additives used to limit systemic absorption;Techniques in Regional Anesthesia and Pain Management;2004-07

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3