A Comparison of Hyper- and Isobaric Solutions of Bupivacaine for Subarachnoid Block

Author:

Phelan Dermot M.12,MacEvilly Myles13

Affiliation:

1. Department of Anaesthesia, Dr. Steevens' Hospital, Dublin, Ireland

2. Registrar in Anaesthesia.

3. Consultant Anaesthetist.

Abstract

The comparative efficacy of two solutions of bupivacaine, 0.5% plain (isobaric — specific gravity 1.010), and 0.4% bupivacaine (hyperbaric — specific gravity 1.027) in 4% dextrose, for spinal anaesthesia was studied in 67 patients. Both solutions were clinically satisfactory (94% completely successful neural blockade). Hyperbaric bupivacaine blocks a greater number of spinal segments (p < 0.01), causes a more rapid fall in blood pressure (p < 0.05), and is more predictable in effect with regard to the number of segments blocked and to the lateralisation of the block. The duration of perioperative analgesia with the hyperbaric preparation is, however, shorter — 3.8 hours as opposed to 5.8 hours (p < 0.01) — but this was likely to be due to the smaller total dosage of bupivacaine used in the hyperbaric group. It is concluded that either solution may be used satisfactorily in clinical practice. The isobaric solution, however, despite its ready availability, is less satisfactory than the hyperbaric because its effect with regard to the extent of blockade is less predictable.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine,Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3