Defining a Reference Range for Vital Signs in Healthy Term Pregnant Women Undergoing Caesarean Section

Author:

Dennis A. T.1,Hardy L.2

Affiliation:

1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology and Department of Pharmacology, The University of Melbourne, Department of Anaesthesia, The Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria

2. The University of Melbourne and Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology and Department of Anaesthesia, The Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria

Abstract

Early warning systems (EWS), used to identify deteriorating hospitalised patients, are based on measurement of vital signs. When the patients are pregnant, most EWS still use non-pregnant reference ranges of vital signs to determine trigger thresholds. There are no published reference ranges for all vital signs in pregnancy. We aimed to define vital signs reference ranges for term pregnancy in the preoperative period, and to determine the appropriateness of EWS trigger criteria in pregnancy. We conducted a one-year retrospective study in a tertiary referral obstetric hospital. The study sample was healthy term women undergoing planned caesarean section (CS). Systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), heart rate (HR), oxygen saturation (SpO2) and temperature were all measured automatically and data was extracted from the medical record. Two hundred and fifty-eight women met inclusion criteria. Results were (mean ± SD [standard deviation]) SBP 118 ± 11.2 mmHg, DBP 75 ± 10.3 mmHg, HR 84 ± 10.2 /minute, respiratory rate 18 ± 1.5 /minute, SpO2 99% ± 1.0% and temperature 36.4°C ± 0.43°C. The reference ranges (mean ± 2SD) determined were SBP 96–140 mmHg, DBP 54–96 mmHg, HR 64-104 /minute, RR 15–21 /minute, SpO2 97%–100% and temperature 35.5°C–37.3°C. This study defined a reference range for vital signs in healthy term pregnant women undergoing CS. Study findings suggest that currently used criteria for EWS triggers, based on non-pregnant values, may be too extreme for timely detection of deteriorating pregnant patients. Further research examining the modified HR triggers of ≤50 and ≥110 /minute in pregnant women and their relationship to clinical outcomes is required.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine,Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Cited by 14 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Multi-modal detection of fetal movements using a wearable monitor;Information Fusion;2024-03

2. Comparing elective and emergency caesarean section by using bioimpedance method;Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics;2023-08-05

3. Maternal sepsis;Best Practice & Research Clinical Anaesthesiology;2022-05

4. Comparison of Inflammatory Parameters in Coronavirus Disease 2019-infected Pregnant Women and Age-matched Nonpregnant Women;Journal of South Asian Federation of Obstetrics and Gynaecology;2022-03-04

5. Improving assessment of acute obstetric patients – introducing a Swedish obstetric triage system;BMC Health Services Research;2021-11-06

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3