A Clinician's Guide to Predicting Fluid Responsiveness in Critical Illness: Applied Physiology and Research Methodology

Author:

Sturgess D. J.12,Joyce C.13,Marwick T. H.13,Venkatesh B.14

Affiliation:

1. School of Medicine, University of Queensland and Department of Intensive Care, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

2. University of Queensland, Princess Alexandra Hospital and Intensive Care Fellow, Wesley Hospital.

3. University of Queensland, Princess Alexandra Hospital and Director of Intensive Care, Princess Alexandra Hospital.

4. University of Queensland, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Deputy Director in Intensive Care, Wesley Hospital and Staff Specialist in Intensive Care, Princess Alexandra Hospital.

Abstract

Intravenous fluid administration is often used in critical care with the goal of improving haemodynamics and consequently tissue perfusion and oxygen delivery. While inotropic and vasoactive drugs are often necessary to correct haemodynamic instability, resuscitation usually begins with fluid therapy. As fluid challenge can result in clinical deterioration, the ability to predict haemodynamic response is desirable. In this way it might be possible to avoid unnecessary volume replacement in critically ill patients. Cardiac preload is a concept that accounts for the relationship between ventricular filling and stroke volume. It has been challenging to apply this concept to clinical practice. For this reason, the study of fluid responsiveness is of increasing research and clinical interest. The clinical application of predicting fluid responsiveness requires an understanding of relevant physiological principles. Furthermore, an improved understanding of these principles should assist the clinician in appraising published data, which has been characterised by significant methodological differences. This review aims to assist the clinician by detailing the physiological principles that underlie the prediction of fluid responsiveness in the critically ill. In addition, the potential importance of methodological differences in the current literature will be considered.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine,Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3