Affiliation:
1. University of Southern California
Abstract
A modified ranking system proved advantageous to a more traditional voting system in guiding admissions in several unexpected areas including the (a) elimination of confounding cross talk as a selection determinant, (b) maximization of regulated discussion concerning each applicant, (c) protection of each selector's privilege to keep private his or her valuation of selection criteria, (d) elimination of ad lib procedures to break voting impasses, and (e) promotion of greater objectivity in selections. It was hypothesized that the two methods for selecting students, ranking versus voting, would yield highly similar results. In 3 proximate years, two separate lists of selected applicants were compiled; one using the ranking method and the other using the voting method. Cohen's correction for agreement of proportions (kappa) yielded coefficients at .89,. 77, and .87, respectively, all significantat p = .(0001. These findings indicated excellent agreement existed between the two selection methods. Furthernore, neithermethodcompronused the selection of disadvantaged students.