Effectivness of Continuing Medical Education

Author:

Lloyd John S.1,Abrahamson Stephen2

Affiliation:

1. American Board of Medical Specialties Evanston, Illinois

2. University of Southern California School of Medicine

Abstract

Evidence regarding the effectiveness of continuing medical education (CME) is reviewed in terms of three possible end- products : physician competence, physician performance, and patient health status. Results of this review are presented in the context of recent increases in mandatory CME policies and the corresponding cost of such policies to the nation. The number of CME activities is evidently on the increase. Yet, according to conventional wisdom, CME is not effective. To the contrary, about half of the 47 evaluation studies published since 1960 reported demonstrable improvement in at least one of the three end-products following CME. However, methodological shortcomings in many of these studies make it impossible to conclude that the improvements were caused by the CME. The authors discuss the need for more research surrounding the subject of CME and its effectiveness.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Health Policy

Cited by 113 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Reducing patients’ rate of frequent attendance through a training intervention for physicians;BMC Medical Education;2024-07-14

2. Communication Skills Training in Workplaces;Cases on Developing Effective Research Plans for Communications and Information Science;2022-06-24

3. Educational interventions for health professionals managing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in primary care;Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews;2022-05-06

4. Continuing education meetings and workshops: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes;Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews;2021-09-15

5. Dentists’ responses about the effectiveness of continuing education activities;European Journal of Dental Education;2018-08-11

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3