Trust in Community-Engaged Research Partnerships: A Methodological Overview of Designing a Multisite Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSA) Initiative

Author:

Kim Mimi M.1ORCID,Cheney Ann2,Black Anita3,Thorpe Roland J.4,Cene Crystal Wiley3,Dave Guarav J.3,Schaal Jennifer3,Vassar Stefanie5,Ruktanonchai Corrine6,Frerichs Leah3,Young Tiffany3,Jones Jennifer7,Burke Jessica7,Varma Deepthi6,Striley Catherine6,Cottler Linda6,Brown Arleen5,Sullivan Greer2,Corbie-Smith Giselle3

Affiliation:

1. Center for Biobehavioral Health Disparities Research, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA

2. Center for Healthy Communities, University of California, Riverside, CA, USA

3. NC TraCS Institute, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA

4. Department of Health, Behavior, and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA

5. Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine/Health Services Research, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA

6. College of Public Health and Health Professions and College of Medicine, University of Florida, FL, USA

7. Health Policy Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA

Abstract

Community-engaged research (CEnR) builds on the strengths of the Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSA) framework to address health in underserved and minority communities. There is a paucity of studies that identify the process from which trust develops in CEnR partnerships. This study responds to the need for empirical investigation of building and maintaining trust from a multistakeholder perspective. We conducted a multi-institutional pilot study using concept mapping with to better understand how trust, a critical outcome of CEnR partnerships, can act as “social capital.” Concept mapping was used to collect data from the three stakeholder groups: community, health-care, and academic research partners across three CTSAs. Concept mapping is a mixed-methods approach that allows participants to brainstorm and identify factors that contribute to a concept and describe ways in which those factors relate to each other. This study offers important insights on developing an initial set of trust measures that can be used across CTSAs to understand differences and similarities in conceptualization of trust among key stakeholder groups, track changes in public trust in research, identify both positive and negative aspects of trust, identify characteristics that maintain trust, and inform the direction for future research.

Funder

University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences

University of California, Los Angeles

University of Florida

University of North Carolina

University of Pittsburgh

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Health Policy

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3